Word of the day: atrocity

Like many of you, I suppose, I woke yesterday morning to the appalling news coming out of Manchester. American pop singer Ariana Grande, who’s very popular with teenagers and young people here, had been performing at the Manchester Arena. The concert ended shortly before half past ten at night and as fans started streaming out into the night, a suicide bomber with an improvised explosive device walked into the foyer and detonated the bomb, blowing himself up and killing at least twenty other people in the process, including several children. Given that tweets by pro-Da’esh / ISIS groups celebrating the attack started circulating very soon afterwards, it’s safe to assume that the attacker may well have been acting in the name of the so-called Islamic State.

İD_bayrağı_ile_bir_militan

Of course, this is not the first time that Manchester has been subjected to terrorist attacks. In 1978, the IRA – the Irish Republican Army, an illegal organization that wants Northern Ireland to be politically independent of the UK and united with the Republic of Ireland, and that has in the past fought for this aim using violent methods – detonated a bomb in the city, although no-one was injured. Then again in 1992 they detonated two bombs, injuring 65 people. Finally, in 1996, a huge bomb was detonated near a large shopping centre, injuring over 200 people. So such actions are nothing new.

Traffic_lights_Manchester_Bombing_1996

However, the IRA sent telephone warnings about 90 minutes before the bomb went off, which allowed at least 75,000 people to be evacuated from the area. Their main target was the city’s infrastructure and economy and the bomb caused almost a billion pound’s worth of damage. This latest attack very deliberately targeted civilians, and not just any old civilians, but innocent children! It was an attack less on our infrastructure than on our minds, and our society. It’s an attack designed to spread fear, and to create divisions in society. The fact that it comes in the middle of a very tense general election campaign is also surely significant. As we saw in France, terrorists use violence to try to influence voting patterns and, historically speaking, at least,  it’s been the hard right – the anti-immigrant, anti-Islam groups – who benefit from such attacks.

1280px-AryanGuardinKensington

Given that we all so often hear of terrible violence being committed in so many different places around the world, for so many different reasons, it’s easy to become numb and turn off and lose all feeling. We can all too easily become immune to shock and horror. And as the violence continues, it no longer feels sufficient to call things like what happened in Manchester on Monday night (or in Sinjar in 2014 or in Karrada last year or in Beslan in 2004) an attack. An attack could also be used to describe what happens if someone is kicked and punched outside a pub, for instance. It doesn’t necessarily imply death on a large scale! Instead, we now talk more and more about atrocities and outrages. Politicians and social commentators discuss this fresh outrage, what can be done to prevent further atrocities from being committed, and push people who had nothing to do with whatever mass murder is most recent to condemn the latest atrocity.

640px-Beslan_foto_pogibshih

Meanwhile, the rest of us down here on planet earth try to get on with our daily lives, to get on with the people we meet every day and to not fall victim to fear, hate or suspicion of others.

Want to learn more with Lexical Lab? Take one of our summer courses.

  • Have there been any atrocities committed in your country over recent years?
  • Had you heard anything about the IRA or about the previous Manchester bombings before?
  • Can you think of any other times you woke to shocking news?
  • Have you ever been evacuated from a building or an area? When? What happened?
  • Do you think terrorist attacks are successful in spreading fear and creating division?

  • bink24

    Heart-warming to see the majority of Mancunians (from all backgrounds), coming together and supporting each other, after this ghastly act intended to sow fear and division.
    Politicians aren’t terrorists . . but I despise those who stir up people’s insecurities and prejudices, for their own political ends.

    • Lexicallab

      I couldn’t agree more. I’m also appalled and disgusted by the tabloids that use these opportunities to play politics and sow further hatreds and divisions.

  • Espe

    Hello! In Spain there was a Terrorism Group called ETA. So we know what the terrorist want.

    • Lexicallab

      Yes, I’m aware of ETA of course. Part of the problem, of course, is that terrorists all want very specific and different things, and sometimes there may be space for political solutions, other times not. With ISIS / Da’esh, there’s clearly no real scope for a diplomatic solution. It’s a battle of ideas as much as anything, but one we’ve not contributed to with our disastrous Middle Eastern interventions!

  • Pingback: Reading for Learners | Pearltrees()

  • Pingback: Reading - L | Pearltrees()


Intermediate word of the day: embrace
Embrace literally means to put your arms around someone, but in conversation we more often use the word hug –
Read more.
Word of the day: kinky
To use one of those understatements that we’re apparently so well known for, the English are not exactly famous for
Read more.
Intermediate word of the day: peak
If something peaks, it reaches its highest or best point, value or level of skill before then becoming worse, lower
Read more.
Phrase of the day: slap bang in the middle
Onomatopoeia is a strange thing. Officially, it’s the use of words that supposedly sound like the sounds they refer to.
Read more.